Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | marimo | act | Gatus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | GitHub | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 23382 | 72501 | 12452 |
| Last activity | October 29, 2026 | — | September 24, 2026 |
| Install complexity | EASY | — | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate |
| Category | Workflow, Data | Testing, Git, DevOps | Security, DevOps |
| Best use | Ideal for a data analyst, Python developer, or small team that wants reproducible experiments, clear Git review, and an interactive report or internal tool from the same source. It is not a replacement for governed BI or a production service requiring enterprise scaling and permissions. | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. |