Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | marimo | Beszel | Gatus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 23382 | 26722 | 12452 |
| Last activity | October 29, 2026 | October 20, 2026 | September 24, 2026 |
| Install complexity | EASY | متوسط / Medium | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate |
| Category | Workflow, Data | DevOps, Monitoring | Security, DevOps |
| Best use | Ideal for a data analyst, Python developer, or small team that wants reproducible experiments, clear Git review, and an interactive report or internal tool from the same source. It is not a replacement for governed BI or a production service requiring enterprise scaling and permissions. | Best for an individual developer or small team running a VPS, home server, or a few Docker hosts and needing a simple dashboard, history, and alerts. Its value is combining host and container metrics in a self-hosted hub. It is not a full logs-and-traces observability platform. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. |