Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | MarkItDown | act | superpowers-dsh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | GitHub | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 191797 | 72437 | 119 |
| Last activity | — | — | — |
| Install complexity | سهل / Easy | — | — |
| Category | Workflow, Research | Testing, Git, DevOps | Multi-Agent, Testing, Workflow |
| Best use | Best for a developer or analyst extracting text from several document formats before search or supplying selected passages to an AI agent. It provides a repeatable CLI command and Python library, while requiring review against the original. It is not intended for layout-perfect document publishing. | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. | Best for DSH users who want reusable development workflow skills in their profile. It does not automate model or effort routing. |