Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Miller | dsh-task-board | Task |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, MCP, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | DeepSeek Harness | Universal, GitHub |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 10049 | 9384 | 16276 |
| Last activity | October 21, 2026 | — | — |
| Install complexity | EASY | Intermediate | سهل / Easy |
| Category | Workflow, Data | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Workflow, DevOps |
| Best use | Ideal for developers, data analysts, and operators who need to clean a CSV export, inspect JSON Lines, or summarize a large file from the terminal without starting a Python project. Use it for quick, repeatable file processing; concurrent transactions and advanced visual analysis still call for a database or complementary analytics tool. | Best for a developer or small team using DSH for recurring or connected work and wanting task state and execution evidence in one record. It pins the project, agent preset, and permission, then runs manually or through Host cron with a human gate for elevated access. It is not a fit for a frequently sleeping machine or unreviewed sensitive automation. | Best for a developer or small team whose project commands span languages, folders, and tools. It provides documented entry points that people and agents can use and review in Git. Existing scripts may be enough for a simple project; Task does not install project tools or sandbox their commands. |