Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Miller | Gatus | act |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, MCP, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Universal | GitHub |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 10049 | 12380 | 72435 |
| Last activity | October 21, 2026 | September 24, 2026 | — |
| Install complexity | EASY | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate | — |
| Category | Workflow, Data | Security, DevOps | Testing, Git, DevOps |
| Best use | Ideal for developers, data analysts, and operators who need to clean a CSV export, inspect JSON Lines, or summarize a large file from the terminal without starting a Python project. Use it for quick, repeatable file processing; concurrent transactions and advanced visual analysis still call for a database or complementary analytics tool. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. |