Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Ruff | uv | marimo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, GitHub | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 50435 | 91554 | 23432 |
| Last activity | November 5, 2026 | October 20, 2026 | October 29, 2026 |
| Install complexity | EASY | Easy on supported systems; Homebrew must already be installed for this command. Windows and standalone installation options are explained in the guide. | EASY |
| Category | Code Review, Testing | Workflow, DevOps | Workflow, Data |
| Best use | Best for an individual Python developer or small team that wants consistent linting, import organization, and formatting locally, in editors, and in CI. It adds reviewable rules, safe-by-default fixes, and a pinnable version. It does not replace tests, type checking, or business-logic review, and migration from Black or Flake8 should be tested on a branch. | For a Python developer or small team that wants a shared setup rather than relying on manually installed packages. Commit the dependency definition and lockfile, then sync the environment and run commands with uv. It does not isolate the operating system or untrusted code, or replace application compatibility tests. | Ideal for a data analyst, Python developer, or small team that wants reproducible experiments, clear Git review, and an interactive report or internal tool from the same source. It is not a replacement for governed BI or a production service requiring enterprise scaling and permissions. |