Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | SOPS | Gitleaks | D2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal, GitHub | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Stars | 23593 | 30619 | 25787 |
| Last activity | October 27, 2026 | October 23, 2026 | October 11, 2026 |
| Install complexity | MODERATE | LOW | Easy with a supported package manager; Homebrew must already be installed for this command. Official binaries, Windows, Linux, and source options are documented. |
| Category | Security, DevOps | Security, Git, DevOps | Workflow, UI |
| Best use | Ideal for a developer or small platform team that wants encrypted configuration beside code with readable Git diffs. Use it for YAML, JSON, ENV and INI files and tightly scoped CI or runtime access. It is not a replacement for dynamic secret issuance or source-system credential rotation. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants a local pre-commit secret scan plus a second CI gate. It is especially useful around deployment configuration and environment files. It does not replace a secret manager or credential revocation after a leak. | For developers and small teams that want architecture and data-flow diagrams close to the repository and reviewable as text. Use it when relationships matter more than pixel-perfect placement; not for free-form marketing design or exact manual positioning. |