Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | SOPS | Gitleaks | Hurl |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal, GitHub | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 23593 | 30619 | 19295 |
| Last activity | October 27, 2026 | October 23, 2026 | October 17, 2026 |
| Install complexity | MODERATE | LOW | Easy; API and CLI knowledge required |
| Category | Security, DevOps | Security, Git, DevOps | Testing, DevOps |
| Best use | Ideal for a developer or small platform team that wants encrypted configuration beside code with readable Git diffs. Use it for YAML, JSON, ENV and INI files and tightly scoped CI or runtime access. It is not a replacement for dynamic secret issuance or source-system credential rotation. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants a local pre-commit secret scan plus a second CI gate. It is especially useful around deployment configuration and environment files. It does not replace a secret manager or credential revocation after a leak. | Best for a developer or small team that wants repeatable API checks with explicit conditions stored beside the code. It links request data and identifies failing assertions without repeating manual inspection. It does not replace browser tests or test-environment setup; curl may be enough for a one-off request. |