Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Superpowers | Hurl | dsh-git-graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode | Universal | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 304147 | 19271 | 9384 |
| Last activity | — | October 17, 2026 | September 25, 2026 |
| Install complexity | — | Easy; API and CLI knowledge required | سهل / Easy |
| Category | Code Review, Multi-Agent, Testing, Workflow | Testing, DevOps | Git, Workflow, UI |
| Best use | Best for a developer or project owner working on a substantial feature or a difficult bug. It helps clarify requirements, approve a plan, and inspect tests and file changes. Its value is a visible path from decision to verification. A small text edit may not need the full workflow. | Best for a developer or small team that wants repeatable API checks with explicit conditions stored beside the code. It links request data and identifies failing assertions without repeating manual inspection. It does not replace browser tests or test-environment setup; curl may be enough for a one-off request. | Best for a developer running several DSH sessions against one repository who wants visible branch context, history, and worktree creation in the UI. It adds session isolation and readable branch-switch guards. It may be excessive for one small change on one branch or for environments that prohibit outbound telemetry. |