Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Superpowers | Miller | Gatus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode | Universal, MCP, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 304147 | 10049 | 12381 |
| Last activity | — | October 21, 2026 | September 24, 2026 |
| Install complexity | — | EASY | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate |
| Category | Code Review, Multi-Agent, Testing, Workflow | Workflow, Data | Security, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for a developer or project owner working on a substantial feature or a difficult bug. It helps clarify requirements, approve a plan, and inspect tests and file changes. Its value is a visible path from decision to verification. A small text edit may not need the full workflow. | Ideal for developers, data analysts, and operators who need to clean a CSV export, inspect JSON Lines, or summarize a large file from the terminal without starting a Python project. Use it for quick, repeatable file processing; concurrent transactions and advanced visual analysis still call for a database or complementary analytics tool. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. |