Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Syncthing | Backlog.md | Superpowers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 89663 | 7130 | 304113 |
| Last activity | October 13, 2026 | — | — |
| Install complexity | Moderate: pair both devices and share folders; APT requires official stable-v2 repository setup first | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | — |
| Category | Security, Workflow | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | Code Review, Multi-Agent, Testing, Workflow |
| Best use | Best for an individual working across two computers or a small team sharing files with trusted devices. It moves folder changes instead of repeating manual copies, while keeping device and storage choices under your control. It does not replace independent backups or collaborative editing, and devices holding the files must be reachable. | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Best for a developer or project owner working on a substantial feature or a difficult bug. It helps clarify requirements, approve a plan, and inspect tests and file changes. Its value is a visible path from decision to verification. A small text edit may not need the full workflow. |